<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 522 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445631</link>
    <description>CESTAT Chennai ruled on CENVAT credit eligibility for input services availed before commercial production commenced. Following precedent from PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS case, the tribunal held that services used for factory setup qualify as input services under Rule 2(l)(ii) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, as they relate directly to manufacturing activities. However, credit for Emergency Medical Services (Rs.31,518) was disallowed as appellant failed to prove these weren&#039;t for personal consumption. Credit disallowance for services by Lease Plan India (Rs.7,664.99) was upheld as uncontested. Appeal allowed partially; remaining service credits were permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 11:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 522 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445631</link>
      <description>CESTAT Chennai ruled on CENVAT credit eligibility for input services availed before commercial production commenced. Following precedent from PEPSICO INDIA HOLDINGS case, the tribunal held that services used for factory setup qualify as input services under Rule 2(l)(ii) of CENVAT Credit Rules 2004, as they relate directly to manufacturing activities. However, credit for Emergency Medical Services (Rs.31,518) was disallowed as appellant failed to prove these weren&#039;t for personal consumption. Credit disallowance for services by Lease Plan India (Rs.7,664.99) was upheld as uncontested. Appeal allowed partially; remaining service credits were permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445631</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>