<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 518 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445627</link>
    <description>The Bombay HC dismissed an appeal in a cheque dishonour case under section 138 of the NI Act. The court held that for prosecution under section 138, the cheque must be issued by someone who owes a legally enforceable debt. The accused was acquitted because the cheque was not issued to discharge the accused&#039;s own debt but allegedly for another person&#039;s liability. Without proper assignment of liability or nexus between the cheque issuance and accused&#039;s obligation to repay, the complainant failed to establish the required legal debt. The presumption under section 139 was successfully rebutted by the accused&#039;s plausible defence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2023 08:35:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732010" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 518 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445627</link>
      <description>The Bombay HC dismissed an appeal in a cheque dishonour case under section 138 of the NI Act. The court held that for prosecution under section 138, the cheque must be issued by someone who owes a legally enforceable debt. The accused was acquitted because the cheque was not issued to discharge the accused&#039;s own debt but allegedly for another person&#039;s liability. Without proper assignment of liability or nexus between the cheque issuance and accused&#039;s obligation to repay, the complainant failed to establish the required legal debt. The presumption under section 139 was successfully rebutted by the accused&#039;s plausible defence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445627</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>