<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (10) TMI 1247 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310770</link>
    <description>A fabricated commissioning report allegedly used in arbitration could found a prima facie case under Sections 192 and 199 of the IPC if it was capable of influencing the tribunal on a material point, and the later setting aside of the award did not erase the alleged offence. The complaint was therefore sustained against the company. By contrast, criminal liability could not be fastened on the chairman without specific averments of personal participation, supervision, or pre-arranged common intention, because Sections 192 and 199 do not create vicarious liability by status alone and Section 34 requires prima facie prior concert; the proceedings against the chairman were quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2023 17:40:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=732004" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (10) TMI 1247 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310770</link>
      <description>A fabricated commissioning report allegedly used in arbitration could found a prima facie case under Sections 192 and 199 of the IPC if it was capable of influencing the tribunal on a material point, and the later setting aside of the award did not erase the alleged offence. The complaint was therefore sustained against the company. By contrast, criminal liability could not be fastened on the chairman without specific averments of personal participation, supervision, or pre-arranged common intention, because Sections 192 and 199 do not create vicarious liability by status alone and Section 34 requires prima facie prior concert; the proceedings against the chairman were quashed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310770</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>