https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310771 The court quashed the proceedings against petitioners 3 to 11, as the complaint lacked specific allegations of their involvement. For petitioners 1 and 2, the court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Trial Court. The Trial Court was instructed to reconsider the complaint and related documents to determine a prima facie case under Sections 403, 405, 424, and 420 of IPC, and Sections 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, due to their presumed responsibility under Section 10(1) of the E.C Act. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 14 Nov 2023 17:40:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310771 The court quashed the proceedings against petitioners 3 to 11, as the complaint lacked specific allegations of their involvement. For petitioners 1 and 2, the court set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the Trial Court. The Trial Court was instructed to reconsider the complaint and related documents to determine a prima facie case under Sections 403, 405, 424, and 420 of IPC, and Sections 7 and 8 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, due to their presumed responsibility under Section 10(1) of the E.C Act. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Nov 2009 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310771