https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310767 A State Forest Department was not shown on the pleadings and facts to be an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, so the protection of Section 25F could not be invoked against termination of a temporary appointee. The Court stressed that the party relying on the Act must plead and establish positive facts showing the character of the establishment, the duties performed, and why the department falls within the statutory definition. An earlier decision could not be extended where no comparable factual foundation was pleaded. The High Court judgment was set aside and the writ petition dismissed. en-us Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:48:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310767 A State Forest Department was not shown on the pleadings and facts to be an "industry" under the Industrial Disputes Act, so the protection of Section 25F could not be invoked against termination of a temporary appointee. The Court stressed that the party relying on the Act must plead and establish positive facts showing the character of the establishment, the duties performed, and why the department falls within the statutory definition. An earlier decision could not be extended where no comparable factual foundation was pleaded. The High Court judgment was set aside and the writ petition dismissed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310767