<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (1) TMI 1022 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310767</link>
    <description>The SC ruled in favor of the State of Gujarat, determining that the Forest Department does not qualify as &quot;an industry&quot; under the Industrial Disputes Act. Consequently, the termination of an employee without complying with Section 25F of the Act was deemed valid. The SC overturned the judgments of the single Judge and Division Bench, dismissing the writ petition and allowing the appeal, with no order as to costs, due to the erroneous application of the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 10:48:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731970" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (1) TMI 1022 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310767</link>
      <description>The SC ruled in favor of the State of Gujarat, determining that the Forest Department does not qualify as &quot;an industry&quot; under the Industrial Disputes Act. Consequently, the termination of an employee without complying with Section 25F of the Act was deemed valid. The SC overturned the judgments of the single Judge and Division Bench, dismissing the writ petition and allowing the appeal, with no order as to costs, due to the erroneous application of the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>