<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 513 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445622</link>
    <description>HC allowed writ petitions challenging tax recovery orders against ex-director during company liquidation. Court determined recovery proceedings should be directed to Official Liquidator, not individual directors. Impugned orders dated 28.09.2020 were set aside, with respondents instructed to approach Official Liquidator for further proceedings. No costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731943" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 513 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445622</link>
      <description>HC allowed writ petitions challenging tax recovery orders against ex-director during company liquidation. Court determined recovery proceedings should be directed to Official Liquidator, not individual directors. Impugned orders dated 28.09.2020 were set aside, with respondents instructed to approach Official Liquidator for further proceedings. No costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445622</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>