<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 512 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445621</link>
    <description>HC ruled on tax demand for slum redevelopment project. Petitioner challenged order&#039;s lack of calculation basis. Court directed filing of appeal within four weeks under MGST Act section 107, keeping all contentions open. No coercive action permitted against petitioner during appeal process. Appellate remedy recommended for detailed examination of project valuation and tax calculation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2025 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731942" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 512 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445621</link>
      <description>HC ruled on tax demand for slum redevelopment project. Petitioner challenged order&#039;s lack of calculation basis. Court directed filing of appeal within four weeks under MGST Act section 107, keeping all contentions open. No coercive action permitted against petitioner during appeal process. Appellate remedy recommended for detailed examination of project valuation and tax calculation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445621</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>