<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 502 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445611</link>
    <description>The ITAT Delhi held that a DRP order issued without a DIN number is invalid and loses its validity. The tribunal found that subsequent separate communication of the DIN number is a superfluous exercise and does not cure the defect. Relying on Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd. and Circular No. 19/2019, the tribunal quashed the impugned DRP/AO order, holding it shall be deemed to have never been passed. The case was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:24:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731932" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 502 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445611</link>
      <description>The ITAT Delhi held that a DRP order issued without a DIN number is invalid and loses its validity. The tribunal found that subsequent separate communication of the DIN number is a superfluous exercise and does not cure the defect. Relying on Brandix Mauritius Holdings Ltd. and Circular No. 19/2019, the tribunal quashed the impugned DRP/AO order, holding it shall be deemed to have never been passed. The case was decided in favor of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445611</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>