<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445600</link>
    <description>The HC of Bombay quashed and set aside the provisional attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found that the six-month statutory period for the attachment had expired and the respondents failed to extend or lift the attachment as required by law. The respondents were directed to inform the bank to withdraw the attachment within one week, emphasizing the duty to respond to requests for defreezing accounts in a timely manner.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:22:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 491 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445600</link>
      <description>The HC of Bombay quashed and set aside the provisional attachment of the petitioner&#039;s bank account under the Customs Act, 1962. The court found that the six-month statutory period for the attachment had expired and the respondents failed to extend or lift the attachment as required by law. The respondents were directed to inform the bank to withdraw the attachment within one week, emphasizing the duty to respond to requests for defreezing accounts in a timely manner.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 31 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445600</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>