<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445585</link>
    <description>The CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant regarding refund of unutilized CENVAT credit from export of services. The tribunal held that revenue authorities cannot deny credit refund without initiating proceedings under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as this is a mandatory prerequisite. Following established legal principle that statutory procedures must be followed as prescribed, the tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s denial of credit, except for amounts totaling Rs. 62,022 where invoices were not submitted or service tax numbers were unavailable, which the appellant had already abandoned.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:19:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 476 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445585</link>
      <description>The CESTAT Mumbai ruled in favor of the appellant regarding refund of unutilized CENVAT credit from export of services. The tribunal held that revenue authorities cannot deny credit refund without initiating proceedings under Rule 14 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, as this is a mandatory prerequisite. Following established legal principle that statutory procedures must be followed as prescribed, the tribunal allowed the appeal and set aside the Commissioner&#039;s denial of credit, except for amounts totaling Rs. 62,022 where invoices were not submitted or service tax numbers were unavailable, which the appellant had already abandoned.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445585</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>