<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 470 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445579</link>
    <description>Clandestine removal cannot be sustained on uncorroborated notebook entries recovered from a third party, unsupported statements, or electricity consumption figures alone; reliable independent evidence of manufacture and removal is required. The notebook entries did not clearly identify the goods or transactions, the alleged writer was not examined, and no corroboration came from transporters, purchasers, raw material suppliers or other independent sources. On the SSI exemption issue, the audited accounts were relied on to show that aggregate clearances did not cross the threshold under Notification No. 8/2003-CE. The duty demand, interest and personal penalties were therefore set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:18:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731900" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 470 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445579</link>
      <description>Clandestine removal cannot be sustained on uncorroborated notebook entries recovered from a third party, unsupported statements, or electricity consumption figures alone; reliable independent evidence of manufacture and removal is required. The notebook entries did not clearly identify the goods or transactions, the alleged writer was not examined, and no corroboration came from transporters, purchasers, raw material suppliers or other independent sources. On the SSI exemption issue, the audited accounts were relied on to show that aggregate clearances did not cross the threshold under Notification No. 8/2003-CE. The duty demand, interest and personal penalties were therefore set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445579</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>