<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (4) TMI 127 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34571</link>
    <description>Service tax was held not leviable on amounts attributable to renting of hotel rooms when the hotel and its garden were rented out for mandap use. The Tribunal noted that an earlier stay order had taken a prima facie view that tax was not payable on charges recovered for renting the hotel, and relied on precedent indicating that the levy in this context applied to halls attached to a hotel, not to hotel rooms. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:42:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (4) TMI 127 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34571</link>
      <description>Service tax was held not leviable on amounts attributable to renting of hotel rooms when the hotel and its garden were rented out for mandap use. The Tribunal noted that an earlier stay order had taken a prima facie view that tax was not payable on charges recovered for renting the hotel, and relied on precedent indicating that the levy in this context applied to halls attached to a hotel, not to hotel rooms. The impugned order was set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34571</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>