<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 466 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445575</link>
    <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appeals abate upon appointment of Interim Resolution Professional or approval of Resolution Plan by NCLT. Following precedent from Mumbai bench, the Tribunal applied Rule 22 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, ruling that appeals automatically abate once successor interest with sufficient rights is appointed by NCLT. The Tribunal emphasized it cannot exceed statutory powers, and any order beyond vested authority would be non est in law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 466 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445575</link>
      <description>CESTAT Bangalore held that appeals abate upon appointment of Interim Resolution Professional or approval of Resolution Plan by NCLT. Following precedent from Mumbai bench, the Tribunal applied Rule 22 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982, ruling that appeals automatically abate once successor interest with sufficient rights is appointed by NCLT. The Tribunal emphasized it cannot exceed statutory powers, and any order beyond vested authority would be non est in law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445575</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>