https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445573 The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs.74,26,040/- along with interest and penalties against the appellant for default in duty payment under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found Rule 8(3A) to be unsustainable, as it had been struck down by various HCs as ultra vires. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief as per law, aligning with established legal precedents and pending appeals before the SC. en-us Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 11 Nov 2023 08:17:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445573 The Tribunal set aside the demand of Rs.74,26,040/- along with interest and penalties against the appellant for default in duty payment under Rule 8 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. The Tribunal found Rule 8(3A) to be unsustainable, as it had been struck down by various HCs as ultra vires. Consequently, the appeal was allowed with any consequential relief as per law, aligning with established legal precedents and pending appeals before the SC. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445573