<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Entertainment Subsidy Doesn&#039;t Reduce Asset Cost Under Income Tax Act, Assessee&#039;s Argument Accepted.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73008</link>
    <description>Determination of cost of Acquistion of assets - reduction of amount subsidy from cost - entertainment subsidy being for the promotion of cinema/ multiplex industry; only because the methodology adopted is to cap it to capital cost of assets will not mean to reduce the cost of asset directly or indirectly in terms of Explanation 10 to Sec. 43(1). This ground of the assessee is allowed. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:29:30 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:29:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Entertainment Subsidy Doesn&#039;t Reduce Asset Cost Under Income Tax Act, Assessee&#039;s Argument Accepted.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73008</link>
      <description>Determination of cost of Acquistion of assets - reduction of amount subsidy from cost - entertainment subsidy being for the promotion of cinema/ multiplex industry; only because the methodology adopted is to cap it to capital cost of assets will not mean to reduce the cost of asset directly or indirectly in terms of Explanation 10 to Sec. 43(1). This ground of the assessee is allowed. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2023 15:29:30 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=73008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>