<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445528</link>
    <description>Coaching provided by an educational institution to its own enrolled students for competitive examinations was assessed for service tax under &quot;Commercial Training or Coaching Service.&quot; Applying the Tribunal&#039;s Larger Bench view that non-recognised certificates render such activity taxable, the Tribunal nevertheless held that where the provider qualifies as an &quot;educational institution&quot; within the meaning linked to s. 66D, Finance Act, 1994, the activity remains outside the service tax net; accordingly, the service tax demand under all categories was set aside. For &quot;renting of immovable property,&quot; the demand was based on receipts below the small service provider exemption threshold; consequently, that demand was also unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2026 14:26:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731800" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 419 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445528</link>
      <description>Coaching provided by an educational institution to its own enrolled students for competitive examinations was assessed for service tax under &quot;Commercial Training or Coaching Service.&quot; Applying the Tribunal&#039;s Larger Bench view that non-recognised certificates render such activity taxable, the Tribunal nevertheless held that where the provider qualifies as an &quot;educational institution&quot; within the meaning linked to s. 66D, Finance Act, 1994, the activity remains outside the service tax net; accordingly, the service tax demand under all categories was set aside. For &quot;renting of immovable property,&quot; the demand was based on receipts below the small service provider exemption threshold; consequently, that demand was also unsustainable. The impugned order was set aside and the appeal allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445528</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>