https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310711 A dispute-resolution clause requiring prior deposit of the amount in dispute may be invalid if it fetters access to arbitration and operates with uncertainty as to what sum is truly disputed. An appointment clause allowing the same authority to name a sole arbitrator may also fail where the appointing authority is ineligible or gives rise to apprehension of bias, because its nominee is likewise disqualified. At the appointment stage, the court may examine both the existence and the validity of the arbitration agreement under Section 11(6A). en-us Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2023 08:51:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310711 A dispute-resolution clause requiring prior deposit of the amount in dispute may be invalid if it fetters access to arbitration and operates with uncertainty as to what sum is truly disputed. An appointment clause allowing the same authority to name a sole arbitrator may also fail where the appointing authority is ineligible or gives rise to apprehension of bias, because its nominee is likewise disqualified. At the appointment stage, the court may examine both the existence and the validity of the arbitration agreement under Section 11(6A). Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 28 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310711