<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 388 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445497</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed by the ITAT due to the invalidity of the assessment order, which lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN) as required by CBDT Circular No.19/2019, rendering it void ab initio. Additionally, the land in question, inherited under Mahar Vatan, was acquired at a Nil cost, resulting in no capital gain as per relevant SC decisions. Consequently, other grounds of appeal were deemed academic and not adjudicated. The decision was pronounced on 12th October 2023.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 18:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731692" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 388 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445497</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed by the ITAT due to the invalidity of the assessment order, which lacked a Document Identification Number (DIN) as required by CBDT Circular No.19/2019, rendering it void ab initio. Additionally, the land in question, inherited under Mahar Vatan, was acquired at a Nil cost, resulting in no capital gain as per relevant SC decisions. Consequently, other grounds of appeal were deemed academic and not adjudicated. The decision was pronounced on 12th October 2023.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>