<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (8) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34547</link>
    <description>The court partially allowed the petition, directing the respondent to assess the petitioners&#039; compliance with the notification requirements and determine their eligibility for the exemption under Notification No.204/92. If found eligible, the bank guarantee was to be returned, and the decision-making process was to be completed within a specified timeframe.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73168" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (8) TMI 77 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34547</link>
      <description>The court partially allowed the petition, directing the respondent to assess the petitioners&#039; compliance with the notification requirements and determine their eligibility for the exemption under Notification No.204/92. If found eligible, the bank guarantee was to be returned, and the decision-making process was to be completed within a specified timeframe.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34547</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>