<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 374 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445483</link>
    <description>Habeas corpus is not maintainable where the person is already in judicial custody under a reasoned remand order, unless that remand is shown to be wholly without jurisdiction, absolutely illegal, or mechanical. Alleged defects in arrest, non-supply of grounds of arrest, or detention beyond 24 hours do not by themselves justify the writ where the custody on the relevant date is pursuant to judicial remand and those objections were not raised at the first opportunity before the remand court. The later requirement to furnish a physical copy of the grounds of arrest did not assist on these facts because the grounds had been served and acknowledged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731678" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 374 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445483</link>
      <description>Habeas corpus is not maintainable where the person is already in judicial custody under a reasoned remand order, unless that remand is shown to be wholly without jurisdiction, absolutely illegal, or mechanical. Alleged defects in arrest, non-supply of grounds of arrest, or detention beyond 24 hours do not by themselves justify the writ where the custody on the relevant date is pursuant to judicial remand and those objections were not raised at the first opportunity before the remand court. The later requirement to furnish a physical copy of the grounds of arrest did not assist on these facts because the grounds had been served and acknowledged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>