https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445482 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, finding that the department failed to verify all facts before issuing the show cause notice regarding Service Tax liability under "Architect Service" and "Interior Decorator Service." The appellant contested the classification and argued against demands under various heads such as event organization and display charges. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) deviated from the show cause notice's scope, emphasizing the need for proper classification and fact verification. The matter was sent back to the original adjudicating authority for reconsideration, allowing the appellant to present relevant evidence. en-us Wed, 08 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 09 Nov 2023 08:48:37 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445482 The Tribunal remanded the case for fresh adjudication, finding that the department failed to verify all facts before issuing the show cause notice regarding Service Tax liability under "Architect Service" and "Interior Decorator Service." The appellant contested the classification and argued against demands under various heads such as event organization and display charges. The Tribunal noted that the Commissioner (Appeals) deviated from the show cause notice's scope, emphasizing the need for proper classification and fact verification. The matter was sent back to the original adjudicating authority for reconsideration, allowing the appellant to present relevant evidence. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 08 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445482