https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310703 In habeas corpus proceedings, the Court examines whether detention is lawful on the date the return is filed, not merely whether an earlier detention order was challenged. A defective preventive detention order may be superseded by a fresh order if the new order is made bona fide and complies with statutory requirements. Section 13 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 permits revocation or modification of a detention order and does not bar a subsequent order against the same person. An earlier challenge, by itself, does not prevent the making of a lawful fresh detention order, and constitutional safeguards do not alter that position. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Nov 2023 10:34:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310703 In habeas corpus proceedings, the Court examines whether detention is lawful on the date the return is filed, not merely whether an earlier detention order was challenged. A defective preventive detention order may be superseded by a fresh order if the new order is made bona fide and complies with statutory requirements. Section 13 of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 permits revocation or modification of a detention order and does not bar a subsequent order against the same person. An earlier challenge, by itself, does not prevent the making of a lawful fresh detention order, and constitutional safeguards do not alter that position. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Jan 1952 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310703