<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 345 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445454</link>
    <description>Bombay HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148A(b) and order u/s 148A(d) where AO alleged petitioner was non-filer for not submitting income return. Court found petitioner had actually filed return, paid taxes, and claimed refund, with return already processed under s.143(1). HC held AO failed to verify basic facts before issuing notice despite having PAN number, making proceedings unjustified. Decision favored assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Aug 2024 12:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731604" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 345 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445454</link>
      <description>Bombay HC quashed reassessment notice u/s 148A(b) and order u/s 148A(d) where AO alleged petitioner was non-filer for not submitting income return. Court found petitioner had actually filed return, paid taxes, and claimed refund, with return already processed under s.143(1). HC held AO failed to verify basic facts before issuing notice despite having PAN number, making proceedings unjustified. Decision favored assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445454</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>