https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445451 The HC quashed the assessment order dated 29th September 2021 due to procedural lapses, including a six-month delay in responding to notices and the failure to grant a personal hearing. The court remanded the case to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) for a fresh assessment, mandating a personal hearing with advance notice. The petitioner was permitted to file a supplementary response by 16th October 2023. The new assessment order must address all submissions and be completed by 31st December 2023. The court emphasized adherence to principles of natural justice without commenting on the merits of the case. en-us Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 08 Nov 2023 09:11:55 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445451 The HC quashed the assessment order dated 29th September 2021 due to procedural lapses, including a six-month delay in responding to notices and the failure to grant a personal hearing. The court remanded the case to the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) for a fresh assessment, mandating a personal hearing with advance notice. The petitioner was permitted to file a supplementary response by 16th October 2023. The new assessment order must address all submissions and be completed by 31st December 2023. The court emphasized adherence to principles of natural justice without commenting on the merits of the case. Case-Laws Income Tax Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445451