https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445428 CESTAT NEW DELHI held that customs broker's license revocation was disproportionate despite violations of CBLR 2018 regulations 10(a), 10(b), and 10(e). The tribunal found violations regarding unauthorized representation and inadequate due diligence in checking dual packing lists, but rejected violations of regulations 10(d), 10(j), 10(k), and 10(q). Court determined violations stemmed from negligence rather than intentional misconduct. License revocation was set aside as disproportionate punishment that would deprive appellant of livelihood, while security deposit forfeiture and penalty were upheld. Appeal allowed in part. en-us Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Apr 2024 12:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445428 CESTAT NEW DELHI held that customs broker's license revocation was disproportionate despite violations of CBLR 2018 regulations 10(a), 10(b), and 10(e). The tribunal found violations regarding unauthorized representation and inadequate due diligence in checking dual packing lists, but rejected violations of regulations 10(d), 10(j), 10(k), and 10(q). Court determined violations stemmed from negligence rather than intentional misconduct. License revocation was set aside as disproportionate punishment that would deprive appellant of livelihood, while security deposit forfeiture and penalty were upheld. Appeal allowed in part. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 07 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445428