<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 308 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445417</link>
    <description>Statutory receipts collected by an infrastructure corporation for land allotment, transfer, processing, supervision, rent, interest on delayed payment, occupation charges, water charges, ground rent and cess were treated as charges arising from its enabling statute and not as consideration for taxable services, so they were held outside service tax. By contrast, receipts from Ekamra Hat were classified as Mandap Keeper Service, maintenance charges for upkeep and allied facilities as Maintenance and Repair Service, and contract receipts from construction-related work as Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, making those receipts taxable. The major demand was therefore set aside, with liability sustained only on the identified taxable service receipts and penalty vacated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 11:51:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 308 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445417</link>
      <description>Statutory receipts collected by an infrastructure corporation for land allotment, transfer, processing, supervision, rent, interest on delayed payment, occupation charges, water charges, ground rent and cess were treated as charges arising from its enabling statute and not as consideration for taxable services, so they were held outside service tax. By contrast, receipts from Ekamra Hat were classified as Mandap Keeper Service, maintenance charges for upkeep and allied facilities as Maintenance and Repair Service, and contract receipts from construction-related work as Commercial and Industrial Construction Service, making those receipts taxable. The major demand was therefore set aside, with liability sustained only on the identified taxable service receipts and penalty vacated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>