<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2010 (7) TMI 1225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310687</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the CIC&#039;s order, mandating the disclosure of information requested by the respondent. It emphasized the necessity of transparency and accountability in public authorities under the RTI Act. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim that the information was exempt from disclosure under sections 8(1)(e) and (j) of the RTI Act, thereby supporting the CIC&#039;s directive for the State Bank of India to provide details on application processing and disaggregated marks in the promotion process. Penalty proceedings against the CPIO were not specifically addressed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 17:09:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731528" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2010 (7) TMI 1225 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310687</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the writ petition and upheld the CIC&#039;s order, mandating the disclosure of information requested by the respondent. It emphasized the necessity of transparency and accountability in public authorities under the RTI Act. The court rejected the petitioner&#039;s claim that the information was exempt from disclosure under sections 8(1)(e) and (j) of the RTI Act, thereby supporting the CIC&#039;s directive for the State Bank of India to provide details on application processing and disaggregated marks in the promotion process. Penalty proceedings against the CPIO were not specifically addressed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310687</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>