<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 288 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445397</link>
    <description>Penalty under section 270A was contested on grounds of under-reporting and misreporting of income relating to cash receipts from a land sale. The Tribunal found income assessed did not exceed income determined on return processing, so no under-reporting occurred; consequence: penalty under provisions for under-reporting was inapplicable. On misreporting, the Tribunal held none of the specified misrepresentation or false-entry clauses applied and relevant receipts had been offered in the return; consequence: misreporting provisions were inapplicable. Search-seizure evidence pertained to third-party documents and books were not updated at search date, supporting exclusion of 270A penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2026 14:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731502" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 288 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445397</link>
      <description>Penalty under section 270A was contested on grounds of under-reporting and misreporting of income relating to cash receipts from a land sale. The Tribunal found income assessed did not exceed income determined on return processing, so no under-reporting occurred; consequence: penalty under provisions for under-reporting was inapplicable. On misreporting, the Tribunal held none of the specified misrepresentation or false-entry clauses applied and relevant receipts had been offered in the return; consequence: misreporting provisions were inapplicable. Search-seizure evidence pertained to third-party documents and books were not updated at search date, supporting exclusion of 270A penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445397</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>