<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 284 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445393</link>
    <description>ITAT Pune upheld addition under section 69 for unexplained investment in plot purchase. Survey at developer&#039;s premises revealed on-money payments by various purchasers including assessee. Other plot buyers disclosed similar payments under Income Declaration Scheme 2016. Tribunal rejected assessee&#039;s argument that addition should be made in subsequent year when sale deed was registered, holding that section 69 applies in the year of making unrecorded investment, not when transaction completes. Addition of Rs. 37 lakh on-money payment was confirmed as assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanation and amount was not recorded in books. Appeal dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Nov 2023 08:54:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731496" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 284 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445393</link>
      <description>ITAT Pune upheld addition under section 69 for unexplained investment in plot purchase. Survey at developer&#039;s premises revealed on-money payments by various purchasers including assessee. Other plot buyers disclosed similar payments under Income Declaration Scheme 2016. Tribunal rejected assessee&#039;s argument that addition should be made in subsequent year when sale deed was registered, holding that section 69 applies in the year of making unrecorded investment, not when transaction completes. Addition of Rs. 37 lakh on-money payment was confirmed as assessee failed to provide satisfactory explanation and amount was not recorded in books. Appeal dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445393</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>