<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 215 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34527</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the imported items should be classified under Heading No. 2515.11 as marble, based on reports confirming their commercial usability as such. The Department&#039;s argument focusing on chemical composition was not deemed decisive. The appeals by the Department were rejected, while those by the importers were allowed, granting consequential relief.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73149" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 215 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34527</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the imported items should be classified under Heading No. 2515.11 as marble, based on reports confirming their commercial usability as such. The Department&#039;s argument focusing on chemical composition was not deemed decisive. The appeals by the Department were rejected, while those by the importers were allowed, granting consequential relief.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34527</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>