<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 229 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34526</link>
    <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding duty demand, citing fraud in the proceedings, which negated time limitations and entitlement to benefits. The imposition of penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act was upheld, but the matter was remanded for a fresh decision, allowing the appellant a reasonable opportunity for a hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73148" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 229 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34526</link>
      <description>The tribunal dismissed the appeal regarding duty demand, citing fraud in the proceedings, which negated time limitations and entitlement to benefits. The imposition of penalty under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act was upheld, but the matter was remanded for a fresh decision, allowing the appellant a reasonable opportunity for a hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34526</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>