https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445374 The NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging service of notice in CIRP proceedings. The appellant, located in corporate debtor's property, argued notice should have been served at registered office rather than branch address. The tribunal found the appellant had responded to liquidator's notices at the branch address, demonstrating actual knowledge of proceedings. Despite lease deed provisions requiring service at specific address, the appellant could not claim improper service after engaging with notices received at branch office. The tribunal held this was not a case warranting interference and dismissed the appeal. en-us Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2023 19:31:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445374 The NCLAT Chennai dismissed an appeal challenging service of notice in CIRP proceedings. The appellant, located in corporate debtor's property, argued notice should have been served at registered office rather than branch address. The tribunal found the appellant had responded to liquidator's notices at the branch address, demonstrating actual knowledge of proceedings. Despite lease deed provisions requiring service at specific address, the appellant could not claim improper service after engaging with notices received at branch office. The tribunal held this was not a case warranting interference and dismissed the appeal. Case-Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy Wed, 01 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445374