<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 213 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34523</link>
    <description>Modvat credit cannot arise from forged or fake invoices, because fraudulent documents confer no enforceable entitlement. Denial of credit, however, must rest on a reasoned adjudication that properly examines the evidence on receipt of inputs, supplier statements, retraction material, technical feasibility, pricing circumstances, and the assessee&#039;s explanation, while giving a fair opportunity to rebut the material. An order that fails to disclose how the enquiry evidence was dealt with, or does not record a proper appraisal before concluding non-receipt of inputs, is inconsistent with natural justice. The adjudication order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after full consideration of the record.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73145" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 213 - CESTAT, KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34523</link>
      <description>Modvat credit cannot arise from forged or fake invoices, because fraudulent documents confer no enforceable entitlement. Denial of credit, however, must rest on a reasoned adjudication that properly examines the evidence on receipt of inputs, supplier statements, retraction material, technical feasibility, pricing circumstances, and the assessee&#039;s explanation, while giving a fair opportunity to rebut the material. An order that fails to disclose how the enquiry evidence was dealt with, or does not record a proper appraisal before concluding non-receipt of inputs, is inconsistent with natural justice. The adjudication order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh decision after full consideration of the record.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34523</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>