<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (8) TMI 1375 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310683</link>
    <description>Interconnect usage charges received by a non-resident telecom operator were treated as not taxable in India because the facility was provided outside India without any transfer of intellectual property, right to use equipment or process, or possession or control of equipment by the Indian service recipients. The process was characterised as a standard commercial process, not a secret process, so the receipts did not constitute royalty or fees for technical services under the Income-tax Act or the India-Spain DTAA. On the alternative section 5 basis, mere payment from India did not establish accrual or arising in India, and no business connection or permanent establishment in India was shown.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 18:56:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (8) TMI 1375 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310683</link>
      <description>Interconnect usage charges received by a non-resident telecom operator were treated as not taxable in India because the facility was provided outside India without any transfer of intellectual property, right to use equipment or process, or possession or control of equipment by the Indian service recipients. The process was characterised as a standard commercial process, not a secret process, so the receipts did not constitute royalty or fees for technical services under the Income-tax Act or the India-Spain DTAA. On the alternative section 5 basis, mere payment from India did not establish accrual or arising in India, and no business connection or permanent establishment in India was shown.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310683</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>