https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310676 Convictions for criminal breach of trust and cheating were set aside because the prosecution's circumstantial evidence did not form a complete chain excluding the appellant's reasonable explanation. The defence version-that the money was temporarily handed over and the appellant was later authorised to raise funds-was found not improbable, and the disputed receipt was not proved to be a forgery. As entrustment and false representation were not established beyond reasonable doubt, convictions under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC could not stand. en-us Tue, 09 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2023 17:24:06 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310676 Convictions for criminal breach of trust and cheating were set aside because the prosecution's circumstantial evidence did not form a complete chain excluding the appellant's reasonable explanation. The defence version-that the money was temporarily handed over and the appellant was later authorised to raise funds-was found not improbable, and the disputed receipt was not proved to be a forgery. As entrustment and false representation were not established beyond reasonable doubt, convictions under Sections 409 and 420 of the IPC could not stand. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 09 Feb 1954 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310676