<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 732 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310674</link>
    <description>The SC condoned the delay and issued a notice limited to the question of remanding the matter back to the Tribunal for further disposal. The decision in Meltex (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commr. of Central Excise was deemed distinguishable, and the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the Department&#039;s lack of opportunity to prove &quot;manufacture&quot; under the Central Excise Act was acknowledged.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 15:41:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731420" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 732 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310674</link>
      <description>The SC condoned the delay and issued a notice limited to the question of remanding the matter back to the Tribunal for further disposal. The decision in Meltex (I) Pvt. Ltd. v. Commr. of Central Excise was deemed distinguishable, and the appellant&#039;s argument regarding the Department&#039;s lack of opportunity to prove &quot;manufacture&quot; under the Central Excise Act was acknowledged.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310674</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>