<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (5) TMI 1266 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310672</link>
    <description>The court condoned a 285-day delay in re-filing the appeal by the appellant/revenue. Regarding the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14 and AY 2014-15, the court found that the respondent/assessee had not earned any exempt income during the relevant periods. As the issue was already addressed by prior judgments of the coordinate bench, no substantial question of law was found. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 10:37:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731409" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (5) TMI 1266 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310672</link>
      <description>The court condoned a 285-day delay in re-filing the appeal by the appellant/revenue. Regarding the deletion of disallowance under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act for AY 2013-14 and AY 2014-15, the court found that the respondent/assessee had not earned any exempt income during the relevant periods. As the issue was already addressed by prior judgments of the coordinate bench, no substantial question of law was found. Consequently, the appeals were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310672</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>