<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (10) TMI 225 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34517</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat credit on electric cables used to establish a dedicated feeder line for increased power requirements in manufacturing. The cables were considered capital goods essential for the manufacturing process, aligning with precedents and the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal rejected imposing a penalty under Section 11AC, deeming the issue a legal interpretation dispute rather than intentional non-compliance. As a result, the appellant was granted relief in this matter.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73139" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (10) TMI 225 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34517</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, allowing Cenvat credit on electric cables used to establish a dedicated feeder line for increased power requirements in manufacturing. The cables were considered capital goods essential for the manufacturing process, aligning with precedents and the Cenvat Credit Rules. The Tribunal rejected imposing a penalty under Section 11AC, deeming the issue a legal interpretation dispute rather than intentional non-compliance. As a result, the appellant was granted relief in this matter.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>