<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 227 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445336</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority, requiring a fresh order with comprehensive documentation for duty quantification. The appellant&#039;s challenge was upheld due to the absence of detailed computation in the demand letter and show cause notice. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific quantification details to ensure proper defense and adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 16:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731375" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 227 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445336</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remanded the case to the adjudicating authority, requiring a fresh order with comprehensive documentation for duty quantification. The appellant&#039;s challenge was upheld due to the absence of detailed computation in the demand letter and show cause notice. The Tribunal emphasized the necessity of specific quantification details to ensure proper defense and adjudication.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445336</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>