<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 218 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445327</link>
    <description>For levy of service tax on supply of tangible goods for use, the decisive test was whether the arrangement transferred the right to use the vessel without transferring possession and effective control. Voyage charter receipts under Fixture Notes were treated as contracts for carriage of goods on freight terms, not as hire of the vessel, so that demand failed. By contrast, the time charter receipts were upheld, while the bareboat charter placed the vessel in the charterer&#039;s full possession and control and fell outside the taxable service. An interest-free refundable security deposit under a lease deed could not be recharacterised as advance rent, and the extended period was unavailable absent suppression with intent to evade tax; penalty was also deleted for the disputed portions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2024 17:04:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731361" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 218 - CESTAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445327</link>
      <description>For levy of service tax on supply of tangible goods for use, the decisive test was whether the arrangement transferred the right to use the vessel without transferring possession and effective control. Voyage charter receipts under Fixture Notes were treated as contracts for carriage of goods on freight terms, not as hire of the vessel, so that demand failed. By contrast, the time charter receipts were upheld, while the bareboat charter placed the vessel in the charterer&#039;s full possession and control and fell outside the taxable service. An interest-free refundable security deposit under a lease deed could not be recharacterised as advance rent, and the extended period was unavailable absent suppression with intent to evade tax; penalty was also deleted for the disputed portions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Jun 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445327</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>