<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1977 (11) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310669</link>
    <description>Joint promisors may enforce a joint promise where one refuses to join as co-plaintiff, provided the non-joining promisee is impleaded as a defendant and no relief is sought against that person. This approach places all necessary parties before the court and avoids multiple proceedings. A licence proviso allowing a performance to continue after expiry protects only the specific play actually in normal run during the final week of the term, until that run ends; it does not authorise new or additional performances. Compensation payable under a joint promise must be treated as payable jointly to both promisors, even where initially awarded to one alone.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 10:27:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731353" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1977 (11) TMI 149 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310669</link>
      <description>Joint promisors may enforce a joint promise where one refuses to join as co-plaintiff, provided the non-joining promisee is impleaded as a defendant and no relief is sought against that person. This approach places all necessary parties before the court and avoids multiple proceedings. A licence proviso allowing a performance to continue after expiry protects only the specific play actually in normal run during the final week of the term, until that run ends; it does not authorise new or additional performances. Compensation payable under a joint promise must be treated as payable jointly to both promisors, even where initially awarded to one alone.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310669</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>