https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310669 A joint promise may be enforced by one promisee when the other refuses to join as co-plaintiff, provided the non-joining promisee is impleaded as a defendant and no relief is sought against him; the article notes that this avoids multiple proceedings and keeps all necessary parties before the court. It also states that a contractual proviso allowing a play to continue after licence expiry applied only to the performance actually in normal run during the relevant week, not to additional plays introduced later. The compensation decree was maintained, with the clarification that it was payable to both joint promisors, not one alone. en-us Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 06 Nov 2023 10:27:05 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310669 A joint promise may be enforced by one promisee when the other refuses to join as co-plaintiff, provided the non-joining promisee is impleaded as a defendant and no relief is sought against him; the article notes that this avoids multiple proceedings and keeps all necessary parties before the court. It also states that a contractual proviso allowing a play to continue after licence expiry applied only to the performance actually in normal run during the relevant week, not to additional plays introduced later. The compensation decree was maintained, with the clarification that it was payable to both joint promisors, not one alone. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 03 Nov 1977 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310669