<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1897 (6) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310668</link>
    <description>In a decision by the Cal HC, the court held that in a suit for the performance of a single contract, all parties must be clearly designated as plaintiffs or defendants. The court determined that certain parties could not seek specific performance against both their adversaries and other defendants. Consequently, the appeal was decreed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit with costs awarded in all courts.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 1897 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2023 10:16:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1897 (6) TMI 1 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310668</link>
      <description>In a decision by the Cal HC, the court held that in a suit for the performance of a single contract, all parties must be clearly designated as plaintiffs or defendants. The court determined that certain parties could not seek specific performance against both their adversaries and other defendants. Consequently, the appeal was decreed, resulting in the dismissal of the suit with costs awarded in all courts.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 1897 00:00:00 +0521</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310668</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>