<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (11) TMI 210 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34507</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the mis-declaration of imported goods but revised the valuation of certain items based on the second statement provided. It set aside a redemption fine and revised duty liability, leading to a reduction in penalties imposed on the appellant from Rs. 20 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (11) TMI 210 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34507</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the mis-declaration of imported goods but revised the valuation of certain items based on the second statement provided. It set aside a redemption fine and revised duty liability, leading to a reduction in penalties imposed on the appellant from Rs. 20 lakhs to Rs. 5 lakhs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34507</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>