https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310649 The ITAT Hyderabad dismissed the assessee's appeal for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a revision order under section 263. The appeal was filed 988 days late. The assessee claimed staff failed to notice the email order and learned of the non-filing only after receiving a tax arrears reminder. The tribunal found the explanation insufficient, noting that 10 months elapsed between the revisional order (28.02.2019) and the consequential order (31.12.2019), yet the assessee failed to act. The tribunal emphasized that law requires vigilance in prosecuting rights under the Act. en-us Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Nov 2023 09:17:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310649 The ITAT Hyderabad dismissed the assessee's appeal for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against a revision order under section 263. The appeal was filed 988 days late. The assessee claimed staff failed to notice the email order and learned of the non-filing only after receiving a tax arrears reminder. The tribunal found the explanation insufficient, noting that 10 months elapsed between the revisional order (28.02.2019) and the consequential order (31.12.2019), yet the assessee failed to act. The tribunal emphasized that law requires vigilance in prosecuting rights under the Act. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 08 Feb 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310649