<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1843 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310644</link>
    <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly. The tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment on royalty payments to associate enterprises, holding that lower authorities incorrectly applied benefit and commercial expediency tests and wrongly used nil comparable transactions. The tribunal remitted the leave encashment disallowance issue pending SC decision in related case. Commission charges addition was deleted as the assessee had filed relevant details and expenditure accrued in relevant year. Book profit computation issue was left for AO verification to avoid double disallowance. Club expenditure disallowance was deleted following judicial consistency with previous year&#039;s DRP decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Nov 2023 11:54:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731281" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1843 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310644</link>
      <description>ITAT Kolkata allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal partly. The tribunal deleted the transfer pricing adjustment on royalty payments to associate enterprises, holding that lower authorities incorrectly applied benefit and commercial expediency tests and wrongly used nil comparable transactions. The tribunal remitted the leave encashment disallowance issue pending SC decision in related case. Commission charges addition was deleted as the assessee had filed relevant details and expenditure accrued in relevant year. Book profit computation issue was left for AO verification to avoid double disallowance. Club expenditure disallowance was deleted following judicial consistency with previous year&#039;s DRP decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310644</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>