<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2023 (11) TMI 205 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445314</link>
    <description>An assessment order under the GST regime must address the assessee&#039;s reply and objections and give a reasoned decision; a cryptic order that reproduces the notice without dealing with the defence violates natural justice. Here, although the assessee had filed replies and been heard in person, the assessment order ignored the explanations and objections. The Madras High Court held the non-speaking order unsustainable, set it aside, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after the reply is taken into account.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Dec 2025 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=731273" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2023 (11) TMI 205 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445314</link>
      <description>An assessment order under the GST regime must address the assessee&#039;s reply and objections and give a reasoned decision; a cryptic order that reproduces the notice without dealing with the defence violates natural justice. Here, although the assessee had filed replies and been heard in person, the assessment order ignored the explanations and objections. The Madras High Court held the non-speaking order unsustainable, set it aside, and remitted the matter for fresh consideration after the reply is taken into account.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>