<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2008 (9) TMI 344 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34505</link>
    <description>Mechanical mixing of a small quantity of polymer with duty-paid bitumen, used immediately for road construction and kept under hot stirring, did not create a new commercially distinct or marketable product. The material retained the character of bitumen, so the process was held not to amount to excisable manufacture and no central excise duty was payable. On demand and penalties, the record showed a bona fide dispute on taxability, supported by contrary departmental views and a circular, so invocation of the extended period was unjustified and penalties could not stand. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73127" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2008 (9) TMI 344 - CESTAT, Bangalore</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34505</link>
      <description>Mechanical mixing of a small quantity of polymer with duty-paid bitumen, used immediately for road construction and kept under hot stirring, did not create a new commercially distinct or marketable product. The material retained the character of bitumen, so the process was held not to amount to excisable manufacture and no central excise duty was payable. On demand and penalties, the record showed a bona fide dispute on taxability, supported by contrary departmental views and a circular, so invocation of the extended period was unjustified and penalties could not stand. The impugned order was set aside and consequential relief granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34505</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>