https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445293 The appeal was dismissed by the ITAT Jaipur Bench due to the assessee's repeated non-compliance with notices and failure to provide supporting documents or submissions. The notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the ex-parte assessment order were upheld. The sale of property was treated as a capital asset, resulting in a sustained addition of Rs. 8,31,375/-. Allegations of unfair treatment were dismissed due to lack of evidence. The bench emphasized the assessee's non-participation and non-compliance as the basis for the dismissal. No separate judgment was issued by the judges. en-us Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 04 Nov 2023 09:16:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445293 The appeal was dismissed by the ITAT Jaipur Bench due to the assessee's repeated non-compliance with notices and failure to provide supporting documents or submissions. The notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act and the ex-parte assessment order were upheld. The sale of property was treated as a capital asset, resulting in a sustained addition of Rs. 8,31,375/-. Allegations of unfair treatment were dismissed due to lack of evidence. The bench emphasized the assessee's non-participation and non-compliance as the basis for the dismissal. No separate judgment was issued by the judges. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 04 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=445293