https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310630 The HC overturned the Sessions Judge's decision that quashed the process against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Cooperative Bank's complaint alleged dishonored cheques by M/s New Sheetal Traders, implicating respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as part of a joint family business. The Court found that the absence of a registered partnership deed did not justify quashing the process prematurely. It reinstated the Judicial Magistrate's order, allowing the case to proceed to trial to determine the true nature of the respondents' involvement. en-us Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 03 Nov 2023 15:24:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310630 The HC overturned the Sessions Judge's decision that quashed the process against respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The Cooperative Bank's complaint alleged dishonored cheques by M/s New Sheetal Traders, implicating respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as part of a joint family business. The Court found that the absence of a registered partnership deed did not justify quashing the process prematurely. It reinstated the Judicial Magistrate's order, allowing the case to proceed to trial to determine the true nature of the respondents' involvement. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 22 Aug 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=310630