<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (9) TMI 4 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34497</link>
    <description>The court upheld the assessment of voluntarily declared income as undisclosed income and taxed it at 60%, emphasizing the lack of regular tax compliance by the assessee. Various incomes were also treated as undisclosed and taxed at a special rate, supported by evidence and lack of disclosure. An addition on account of a kitty account was confirmed, despite the assessee&#039;s denial, due to lack of evidence linking them to the account. The court affirmed additions without full consideration, relying on seized documents and materials. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question was identified, stressing the importance of proper disclosure and assessment under the Income Tax Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 23 Jun 2012 12:21:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=73119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (9) TMI 4 - PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34497</link>
      <description>The court upheld the assessment of voluntarily declared income as undisclosed income and taxed it at 60%, emphasizing the lack of regular tax compliance by the assessee. Various incomes were also treated as undisclosed and taxed at a special rate, supported by evidence and lack of disclosure. An addition on account of a kitty account was confirmed, despite the assessee&#039;s denial, due to lack of evidence linking them to the account. The court affirmed additions without full consideration, relying on seized documents and materials. The appeal was dismissed as no substantial legal question was identified, stressing the importance of proper disclosure and assessment under the Income Tax Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=34497</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>